This review discusses just just how two psychology that is theories–evolutionary social structural theory–apply to mate choices, envy, and aggression. It compares explanations from both theories for every single intercourse huge difference. Evolutionary therapy maintains that intercourse distinctions develop biologically as individuals conform to alterations in environmental surroundings. The focus that is main evolutionary therapy is reproduction of generations to come. Personal structural concept maintains that intercourse distinctions derive from alterations in culture and social roles occupied by both women and men. Social theory that is structural draws upon social explanations.
This paper compares the views of evolutionary psychology and social theory that is structural intercourse variations in envy, mate choices, and violence. Both of these theories shed significantly different lights on the origins of intercourse differences between both women and men. Both theories discuss sex variations in mate choices, envy, and violence. Explanations through the two theories are contrasted and compared.
Explanations for Sex Differences
The social structural concept states that the critical reason for intercourse distinctions is social framework. Because both women and men generally have various roles that are social they become psychologically dissimilar to conform to their social functions (Eagly & Wood, 1999). Continue reading “Evolutionary Versus Social Structural Explanations for Intercourse Distinctions”